Source Authority
Whether the source itself is credible and appropriate for the subject.
Citation Integrity™
Citation Integrity™ is the assessment of characteristics that affect whether information can be depended upon as evidence within an AI-generated answer.
AI systems increasingly depend upon external information. Citation Integrity™ asks a fundamental question: Should this information be relied upon?
Citation Integrity™ is the method. Being cited by AI is the outcome we measure.
By CiteAbility™ · Last updated
Visibility is not integrity
A source can be highly visible without being dependable.
A page can rank well without adequately supporting its claims.
A company can be widely mentioned while publishing contradictory information.
AI discoverability answers
Can the system find it?
Citation Integrity™ asks
Can the system depend upon it?
The framework
CiteAbility™’s public Citation Integrity™ framework has eight dimensions. The dimensions describe what is assessed; the underlying methodology remains confidential.
The Dimensions describe the areas CiteAbility™ evaluates as information moves from Accessible to Citeable. Outcomes then observes whether an AI system actually cites it.
This explains what Citation Integrity™ means while the underlying assessment methodology remains proprietary.
Whether the source itself is credible and appropriate for the subject.
Whether the person or organisation behind the information is qualified for the claim.
Whether verified, attributable information about an organisation’s conduct, transparency or standing is materially relevant to reliance.
Whether claims are substantiated and cited sources genuinely support them.
Whether the source shows direct knowledge, testing or original evidence.
Whether information is accurate, complete, specific, current and appropriately qualified.
Whether an AI system can reliably discover, parse and attribute the information.
Considered together, whether the information should be relied upon and cited.
The underlying assessment methodology remains proprietary CiteAbility™ intellectual property.
Plain-English definition
A claim is a factual statement about a business, product, service, person or event that an AI system may repeat. CiteAbility™ considers whether a claim is attributable, supported by relevant evidence, appropriately qualified and suitable for responsible reliance. Repetition or confident wording is not proof.
See the Citation Integrity™ GlossaryWhy it matters
AI-generated answers increasingly influence:
If the information behind those answers is weak, poorly supported or inconsistent, the resulting answer may also be weaker. Citation Integrity™ therefore focuses on improving the information layer underneath AI.
Boundaries
CiteAbility™ does not promise to make a particular AI system cite you, recommend you, rank you, mention you, or include you in an answer.
Third-party AI systems make their own decisions.
CiteAbility™ focuses on something more fundamental: improving the integrity of the information those systems may encounter.
Citation Integrity™ Commitment
Separately from any CiteAbility™ assessment, an organisation can voluntarily adopt the Citation Integrity™ Commitment — a public statement about publishing information that is accurate, attributable, current and suitable for responsible reliance.
The Commitment is a self-attestation by the organisation. It does not mean CiteAbility™ has independently verified, measured, approved or certified that organisation, and it is separate from Citation Integrity™ Certified, which is earned by passing the certification checks.
Next step
FAQ
The questions organisations ask us most often.